Last week I noticed
one of those leaves. You know
the sort - the little 'hints' that appear on
Ancestry, to indicate that they have identified an item
in their records, or in someone else's pedigree, which the company's search
tools suggest could possibly relate to someone in my own pedigree.
When I first put my tree online, there were over 1000 of these and some
of the suggestions seemed so ridiculous to me that I soon decided to ignore the
little leaves.
But not this one.
This one was on my
DNA account. That's the same pedigree for me,
but being matched to a specific group of people as comparisons, people already
identified by Ancestry as connected to me through shared DNA.
Excitedly, I checked
my match's details. A private tree. Never mind, send a message - and wait. (Did they receive the message? How long should I wait before sending
another, 'just in case' the first went astray? Oh, aren't we genealogists so impatient at
times!)
I receive a reply.
Hurrah!
And, yes, we do
appear to have a common ancestor. Or,
more correctly, a common ancestral couple.
Thomas DOWDING (b. 1768 d. 1857) and Ann WHATLEY (d. 1861), living in Donhead St Andrew. I descend from their son, George , who
married Mary COLLINS and my match descends from their daughter Jane, who
married a John HOWELL. I show the family
on my "DNA Tree" at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/im.griffiths/parryfamilyhistory/personaldnatree.htm (search the page for "Whatley" to find them, as I haven't yet added links to specific families).
The research for this family was mainly
carried out by my mother, and it is part of my "Genealogy Do-Over"
goals to check her work during this year.
But, at the death of Ann DOWDING, the widow of Thomas DOWDING,
the informant was a John HOWELL, and I have found some look-ups I did for Mum
on Ancestry, back in 2005, relating to the John HOWELL, so we were definitely
considering that family as another descendant branch.
John HOWELL appears
to have first been married to a Mary (HO107/1175/5/ED8/F22/P6) and had at least
four children by 1841. There is a
possible death for Mary in March 1849 and, based on the 1851 census, John and
Mary had, had further children by then (HO107/1849/62/24). John then marries Jane DOWDING* and has at
least three children, Emma J, Georgina and Abigail.
My DNA match is
descended from Emma Jane HOWELL.
The Ancestry
relationship prediction is that we are 5th-8th cousins. From the genealogical relationships, we are
4th cousins , once removed.
Unfortunately, at
Ancestry there is no chromosome browser, so we cannot see where we share
DNA. If we could, it would enable us to
each identify our other matches over the same area. If those matches then matched both of us
there, this would mean we all shared the same common ancestry somewhere on the
lines through Thomas or Ann (either their descendants, or, as descendants of one of their ancestors). Thus it would potentially help us find our
connection to these other people, who might not have sufficient
detail in their pedigrees for us to spot the link from the pedigrees alone.
Also, currently,
even though the two of us have found common ancestors, it does not necessarily
follow that the shared DNA definitely comes through them - so, finding other
matches who share the same DNA segments with both of us would enable us to see
whether their pedigrees have the potential to link to this same ancestral
couple, which would help to confirm where the DNA actually came from.
I wonder if my match
might be willing to upload their data to Gedmatch, so that we can actually
compare DNA - currently, transferring the data elsewhere is the only way to
make up for the deficiency in the Ancestry provision.
So, there is still a
lot to confirm, but at least this 'shaking leaf' does seem to be a hint in the right
direction.
[*Jane appears to
have been married before as well - a Jane DOWDING marrying an Elias DUNFORD in
1842, with Elias dying in 1843, and a 'Jane DUNFORD' then marrying John HOWELL
in 1849. These details do still need confirming.]
Thank you for sharing this. There is hope for us all. I'm still looking forward to receiving my first shaky leaf hint. As a matter of interest was your match with someone in the UK who'd just recently the ordered a test or don't you yet know?
ReplyDeleteGood question, Debbie. The match is in the US, but I hadn't thought to also check how recent their appearance on my list might be. Sorting by date, it does look as if they have been on it for a while, after all. Perhaps the appearance of the hint now is due to them working on their tree.
DeleteSo too soon to be celebrating an increase from the UK after all. :(